BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
SOLDOTNA, ALASKA
June 4, 1991
7:30 P.M.
REGULAR ASSEMBLY MEETING
MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. INVOCATION
Pastor Robert I. Townsley, Soldotna Church of Christ gave the invocation.
D. ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Sewall, McLane, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
EXCUSED ABSENCES: Little, Nash
E. VACANCY, DESIGNATION OR SEATING OF ASSEMBLY MEMBERS
F. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of Regular Assembly Meeting, 5/7/91
The minutes of the Regular Assembly Meeting, 5/7/91, were approved as submitted with one minor correction as noted by the Clerk's Office.
H. COMMITTEE REPORTS
Finance - (Chm. Sewall)
The Finance Committee met with a quorum and discussed all agenda items.
Legislative - (Chm. McLane)
The Legislative Committee did not meet. Marla Huss, KPB Legislative Liaison, presented her final report, on the first half of the Seventeenth Legislative Session, to the Assembly.
Local Affairs/Lands - (Chm. Brown)
The Local Affairs/Lands Committee met with a quorum and discussed all agenda items.
Public Works/Education - (Chm. Moock)
The Public Works/Education Committee met with all members present and discussed all agenda items.
Other Committees
REPORTS OF COMMISSIONS AND COUNCILS
There were none.
AGENDA APPROVAL AND CONSENT AGENDA
Assemblymember Glick requested that agenda items N (2) and N (3) be placed on the Consent Agenda.
Assemblymember Moock requested that Resolution 91-73 be removed from the Consent Agenda. Resolution 91-73 was placed under Agenda Item M, (3).
Assemblymember McLane requested that Resolution 91-66 and 91-67 be placed on the Consent Agenda. Mayor Gilman noted that Resolution 91-67 was not in final form. President Skogstad noted that Resolution 91-66 had been replaced by a substitute. There was objection to placing Resolutions 91-66 and 91-67 on the Consent Agenda.
Assemblymember Glick asked that Resolution 91-74 be removed from the Consent Agenda. Resolution 91-74 was placed as the third item of business following Resolution 91-73 under Agenda Item M.
Assemblymember McLane requested that Agenda Item I (8) be removed from the Consent Agenda. No. 8 was placed under Agenda Item U, Other Business.
The Consent Agenda now reads:
Resolution 91-71: "Concept Approval of the Port Graham/English Bay Area Meriting Special Attention (AMSA) as an Addition to the Kenai Peninsula Borough Coastal Management Program" (Mayor)
Ordinance 91-24: "Authorizing a Transfer of Responsibility Agreement With the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and Appropriating Funds in the Amount of $48,000 to Carry Out the Agreement" (Mayor) (Shortened Hearing 6/18/91)
Ordinance 91-25: "Authorizing Initiative Petitions to be Filed and Voted on by Service Area Voters" (Hodgins) (Hearing 7/2/91)
Ordinance 91-26: "Amending KPB 5.22 - Provisions for Grants to Senior Citizen Programs" (Glick) (Hearing 7/2/91)
Ordinance 91-27: "Amending the Borough Election Code to Authorize Mail-In Ballots for Special Elections" (Hodgins) (Hearing 7/2/91)
Petition to Vacate: M. Nakada, H. Nakada and M. Nakada of Homer, Alaska
Petition to Vacate: R. E. Clutts for Anchor River Inn, Inc. of Homer, Alaska
Committee Reports on the Consent Agenda:
1. Local Affairs/Lands Committee:
. Support unanimously Ordinances 91-25 and 91-26.
. Support placing the three vacation petitions on the Consent Agenda
2. Finance Committee
. Voted unanimously "do set for hearing" Ordinance 91-24
. Majority vote "do introduce" Ordinance 91-26
3. Public Works/Education Committee
. Voted "do introduce" Ordinance 91-25
ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO PLACE THE REMAINING VACATION PETITION, SECTION N, NO. 1, IN FRONT OF SECTION J.
Assemblymember Sewall spoke in favor of Mr. Brown's motion.
THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE BROWN MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
ASSEMBLYMEMBER GLICK MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AND AGENDA AS AMENDED
UNANIMOUS CONSENT WAS REQUESTED
THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE GLICK MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
1. Petition to Vacate: M. E. Israelson and F. Duthweiler of Kenai, Alaska (Agenda Item N, 1)
Assemblymember McLane noted a conflict of interest and abstained from voting.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER GLICK MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF THE PETITION TO VACATE
Chairman Brown reported that the Local Affairs/Lands Committee unanimously voted "move to vacate."
President Skogstad called for public comment.
Sue Duthweiler, 37675 Cannery Road, Kenai, stated she and her husband own the property south of the easement being discussed. Ms. Duthweiler urged the Assembly approve the vacation and reported there is acceptable public beach access nearby with adequate public parking and safe roads available. She also stated the City of Kenai had agreed that a more appropriate access could and should be developed on city lands north of this particular access.
Mary Ellen Israelson, Cannery Road, Kenai, the petitioner to the north of the easement also urged Assembly members to approve the vacation petition.
President Skogstad closed public comment.
Assemblymembers Walli and Sewall spoke against the vacation petition.
Assemblymembers Brown and Superman spoke in support of the vacation petition.
THE GLICK MOTION TO APPROVE THE PETITION TO VACATE PASSED BY A VOTE OF 10 YES, 3 NO, 1 ABSTENTION
YES: Anderson, Superman, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee, Hodgins
NO: Sewall, Keene, Walli
ABS: McLane
ITEMS NOT COMPLETED FROM PRIOR AGENDA
1. Resolution 91-72: "Selecting Reapportionment Plan Options to be Prepared for Assembly Consideration and Submission to the Voters" (Skogstad)
ASSEMBLYMEMBER GLICK MOVED TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 91-72
President Skogstad called for public comment.
Jack Hetherton, Mile 1.4 Spur Road, urged the Assembly to adopt the reapportionment plan that would best represent the voters of the Kenai Peninsula Borough.
President Skogstad closed public comment.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER GLICK MOVED TO AMEND RESOLUTION 91-72 WITH RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE
UNANIMOUS CONSENT WAS REQUESTED
THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE GLICK MOTION TO AMEND TO RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
Following a discussion regarding the procedure to be used for selection of plans to be placed on Resolution 91-72 Substitute, the decision was made to address each plan individually.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER HODGINS MOVED TO AMEND SECTION 1, BY ADDING A THIRD PLAN
UNANIMOUS CONSENT WAS REQUESTED. THERE WAS OBJECTION.
Assemblymembers Glick and Sewall spoke against the Hodgins' amendment.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER HODGINS WITHDREW HIS MOTION
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MCLANE MOVED TO ELIMINATE PLAN 3, ELEVEN SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS
UNANIMOUS CONSENT WAS REQUESTED
THERE BEING NO OBJECTION, THE MCLANE MOTION TO ELIMINATE PLAN 3 PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MCLANE MOVED TO ADD A TENTH PLAN, A THREE DISTRICT PLAN WITH FOUR MEMBERS-AT-LARGE IN EACH DISTRICT, TO BE NAMED PLAN 3
UNANIMOUS CONSENT WAS REQUESTED. THERE WAS OBJECTION.
Assemblymember Moock spoke against the McLane motion.
THE MCLANE MOTION FAILED BY A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Anderson, Superman, Skogstad, Delacee, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Keene, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MCLANE MOVED TO HOLD A SUCCESSIVE ROUND OF PUBLIC VOTES ON EACH PLAN LISTED IN RESOLUTION 91-72, THE PLAN(S) RECEIVING THE LEAST NUMBER OF VOTES TO BE ELIMINATED IN EACH ROUND OF VOTING. IN THE EVENT THAT MORE THAN TWO PLANS REMAIN AT THE END OF THE ELIMINATION PROCESS, A POSITIVE MOTION WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PLACE ANY OF THOSE PLANS IN SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE
THE MCLANE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY
At this time President Skogstad called for discussion of the various plan options.
Assemblymember Keene spoke against any of the 3 district plan options, stating that areas such as Moose Pass, Seward, and Hope have very little chance, if any, of having a representative on this assembly. The majority of the population will be centered in the Soldotna area unless the Borough is divided into single member districts.
Assemblymember Hodgins noted a typographical error on Attachment A to Resolution 91-72, Plan 1. The descriptive sentence should read "from 2 to 5 each" rather than "2 to 4 each."
President Skogstad summarized the plans, noting which plans comply with the 10% variation limits set by the Federal Government.
President Skogstad stated that he supports Plans 1 and 6, which both comply with the 10% variation limits.
Assemblymember O'Connell stated he preferred 15 or 16 single member districts, giving each district equal representation.
Assemblymember Brown spoke against a 16 member district plan.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MOOCK MOVED TO POSTPONE CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE UNTIL JULY 2, 1991
Assemblymembers McLane, Sewall and O'Connell spoke against postponement.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MOOCK WITHDREW HER MOTION
Assemblymember Superman spoke against single member districts, and in support of Plans 1 and 5.
Assemblymember Brown spoke against single member districts, and stated he endorses Plan 1.
ROUND ONE:
PLAN 1 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 7 YES, 7 NO
YES: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Brown, Skogstad, Glick
NO: McLane, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 2 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 6 YES, 8 NO
YES: McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Brown, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 4 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 6 YES, 8 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick
NO: Anderson, Superman, Keene, Brown, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 5 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 5 YES, 9 NO
YES: Anderson, Superman, Brown, DeLacee, Hodgins
NO: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick, Walli
PLAN 6 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: McLane, Superman, Keene, Poindexter, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Moock, Brown, O'Connell, Glick
PLAN 7 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Brown, Skogstad, Hodgins
PLAN 8 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 4 YES, 10 NO
YES: McLane, Brown, O'Connell, Hodgins
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
PLAN 9 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 4 YES, 10 NO
YES: McLane, O'Connell, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee
PLAN 10 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 6 YES, 8 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, O'Connell, Glick, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, Skogstad, DeLacee
President Skogstad eliminated Plans 8 and 9 following the first round of voting.
ROUND TWO:
PLAN 1 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 7 YES, 7 NO
YES: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Brown, Skogstad, Glick
NO: McLane, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 2 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 5 YES, 9 NO
YES: Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick
NO: Sewall, McLane, Anderson, Superman, Brown, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 4 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 7 YES, 7 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Keene, Brown, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins
PLAN 5 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 5 YES, 9 NO
YES: Anderson, Superman, Brown, DeLacee, Hodgins
NO: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick, Walli
PLAN 6 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Poindexter, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Moock, Brown, O'Connell, Glick
PLAN 7 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Moock, O'Connell, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Brown, Poindexter, Skogstad, Hodgins
PLAN 10 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 7 YES, 7 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Brown, O'Connell, Glick, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, Skogstad, DeLacee
President Skogstad eliminated Plans 2 and 5 following Round Two.
ROUND THREE:
PLAN 1 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 6 YES, 8 NO
YES: Anderson, Superman, Keene, Brown, Skogstad, Glick
NO: Sewall, McLane, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 4 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 7 YES, 7 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick
NO: Anderson, Superman, Brown, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
PLAN 6 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: Sewall, Anderson, Keene, Poindexter, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
NO: McLane, Superman, Moock, Brown, O'Connell, Glick
PLAN 7 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 9 YES, 5 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Brown, Skogstad, Hodgins
PLAN 10 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 6 YES, 8 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Brown, Glick, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad DeLacee
President Skogstad eliminated Plans 1 and 10 following the third round.
President Skogstad called for assembly discussion. Seeing none, the discussion period was closed.
ROUND FOUR:
PLAN 4 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 10 YES, 4 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Anderson, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
NO: Superman, Keene, Brown, Hodgins
PLAN 6 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 5 YES, 9 NO
YES: Anderson, Skogstad, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Sewall, McLane, Superman, Keene, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, O'Connell, Glick
PLAN 7 RECEIVED A VOTE OF 6 YES, 8 NO
YES: McLane, Moock, Poindexter, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Brown, O'Connell, Skogstad, Hodgins
President Skogstad stated that Plan 6 had been eliminated in Round 4 and Plans 4 and 7 remain.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MCLANE MOVED TO PLACE PLAN 4 AND PLAN 7 UNDER SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE
ASSEMBLYMEMBER SUPERMAN MOVED TO AMEND THE MCLANE MOTION TO INCLUDE A THIRD PLAN: 3 DISTRICTS, 4 MEMBERS EACH BOROUGH-WIDE
Assemblymembers Anderson and Brown spoke in favor of the Superman motion.
Assemblymembers Moock, Poindexter, McLane, Sewall, and Walli spoke against the Superman amendment.
THE SUPERMAN AMENDMENT FAILED BY A VOTE OF 4 YES, 10 NO
YES: Anderson, Superman, Brown, Hodgins
NO: Sewall, McLane, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO AMEND RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE TO ALLOW FOR A NINE MEMBER ASSEMBLY VOTED ON AT-LARGE
President Skogstad noted that Attorney Boedeker had indicated previously that any body voted on at-large will likely not meet federal mandates due to the more urban areas of the borough overshadowing the rural areas in the one-man, one-vote concept.
ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROWN WITHDREW HIS MOTION
RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE, WITH PLANS 4 AND 7, WAS ADOPTED BY A VOTE OF 10 YES, 4 NO
YES: Sewall, McLane, Anderson, Keene, Moock, Poindexter, Skogstad, Glick, DeLacee, Walli
NO: Superman, Brown, O'Connell, Hodgins
ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROWN MOVED TO RECONSIDER RESOLUTION 91-72 SUBSTITUTE
2. Appeal of Decision of Planning Commission, April 15, 1991 regarding Sylvan Circle, Tract 1-D-1 Scenic Heights S/D
ASSEMBLYMEMBER GLICK MOVED TO GRANT THE APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
President Skogstad called for committee reports.
Assemblymember Moock reported that the Public Works/Education Committee voted unanimously to uphold the Planning Commission decision.
Seeing and hearing no further committee reports, President Skogstad called for public comments.
Rhonda Clayton, 36340 Sylvan Circle, spoke for the petitioner, Ron Harvey. She presented pictures of the property and explained the reasons the petitioners were requesting the vacation.
Orville McWethy, 36345 Sylvan Circle, spoke in favor of the vacation.
Discussion followed concerning borough liability should the property owner's well be damaged during snow plowing, and potential problems if the property were offered for sale.
President Skogstad stated that a no vote will uphold the Planning Commission decision, a yes vote will grant the right-of-way vacation.
THE MOTION TO GRANT THE APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FAILED BY A VOTE OF 4 YES, 10 NO
YES: Brown, Poindexter, Skogstad, DeLacee
NO: Sewall, McLane, Anderson, Superman, Keene, Moock, O'Connell, Glick, Hodgins, Walli
3. Ordinance 91-18: "Consolidation of the Existing Four Road Service Areas into One Road Service Area" (Skogstad, McLane) (Hearing 7/2/91)
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MOOCK MOVED TO ADJOURN
THE MOOCK MOTION FAILED BY A VOTE OF 8 YES, 6 NO
YES: McLane, Keene, Moock, Brown, Poindexter, DeLacee, Hodgins, Walli
NO: Sewall, Anderson, Superman, O'Connell, Skogstad, Glick
ASSEMBLYMEMBER MCLANE MOVED TO SET FOR HEARING ORDINANCE 91-18 ON JULY 2, 1991
Local Affairs/Land Committee voted 3-2 "do introduce."
Public Works/Education voted "do introduce" by a vote of 4 yes, 1 abstain.
President Skogstad called for public comment. There was none.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT WAS REQUESTED. THERE WAS OBJECTION.
A point of order from Assemblymember Nash was placed before the Assembly in the form of a written memorandum.
Borough Attorney Schmidt stated that the point of order referred to by Mr. Nash in his memorandum does not apply to the establishment, alteration, or abolishment of service areas by the Assembly, but rather to the petition process that is initiated by voters.
At this time, the legislative deadline of 11:30 p.m. was reached.
MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER
ORDINANCE HEARINGS - to be considered when meeting of June 4, 1991 reconvenes.
Ordinance 91-9: "Repealing Chapter 17.04 of the Borough Code and Enacting a New Chapter 17.06 to Govern Classification and Disposition of Borough Lands" (Mayor)
Ordinance 91-22: "Amending Chapter 22.40 of the Borough Code to Add a Provision for Clarifying Procedures for Reconsideration of Assembly Actions" (Policies & Procedures Committee)
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS - to be considered when meeting of June 4, 1991 reconvenes.
Resolution 91-66: "Authorizing the Purchase of Land From Leonard H. Ballard and Fern E. Ballard for the Purpose of Establishing a Buffer Zone of Properties Around the Soldotna Landfill Site" (Mayor)
Resolution 91-73: "Providing for a Proposition Authorizing the Acquisition of a Nonareawide Power of the Borough to Form Special Assessment Districts to Allow for Construction of Extension of Utility Lines" (Hodgins, Little)
Resolution 91-74: "Setting New Salary Maximums for Certain Executive and Administrative Employees" (Mayor)
CONSIDERATION OF VACATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY
INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES NOT ON CONSENT AGENDA
ADDITION OF LATE ITEMS
PENDING LEGISLATION
(This item lists legislation which will be addressed at a later time as noted)
Ordinance 91-20: "Authorizing A Lease With Option to Purchase on Lands Located Within a Portion of the NW�NE� of Section 36 and a Portion of the S�SE� of Section 25, Township 5 North, Range 3 West, Seward Meridian" (Mayor) (Hearing 6/18/91)
Ordinance 91-21: "Appropriating Funds for Fiscal Year 1991-92" (Mayor) (Hearing 6/11/91)
Resolution 91-15: "Providing for the Continuation of Wages for Kenai Peninsula Borough Employees Serving in Reserves and National Guard Who Are Called to Active Duty" (Mayor)(Tabled)
6. Ordinance 90-65: "Enacting New KPB Chapter 5.30 Special Assessments to Provide Authority for Special Assessment Districts for Financing of Improvement to Existing Dedicated Public Rights-of-Way up to Borough Road Construction Standards" (Mayor) (Tabled)
FORMAL PRESENTATIONS WITH PRIOR NOTICE UPON SUBJECTS NOT ON THE MEETING AGENDA (10 Minutes)
There were none.
PUBLIC COMMENTS AND PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes)
There were none.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Mayor Gilman gave an update on the forest fire in the Cooper Landing vicinity.
OTHER BUSINESS - to be considered when the June 4, 1991 meeting reconvenes.
Confirmation of Gaye Vaughan as Borough Clerk
ASSEMBLY AND MAYOR'S COMMENTS
President Skogstad reminded assembly members of the Special Assembly Meeting scheduled for June 11th. He also announced that from 4 -7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 11, 1991 the Legislative Information Office would be holding an open house.
President Skogstad acknowledged and thanked those members of the Borough staff who had given up their Memorial weekend to address the fire situation in Cooper Landing.
Assemblymember Sewall noted an Emergency Planning Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday, June 5th.
Assemblymember Keene reported that representatives of the Kenai River Board, Fish & Game and State Parks traveled down the Kenai River to gather information concerning erosion and to determine the need for the development of a pilot project for erosion control and bank stabilization.
Assemblymember Anderson thanked the staff at Heritage Place and the graduates of People Count, Inc. for the meal that they prepared that evening.
Assemblymember Superman reported that:
1) DEC will not be removing the contaminated soils from Sterling and it appears the Borough will have to spend funds appropriated to the legal department in litigation;
2) The air quality centers in North Kenai will be shut down shortly;
3) There will be a general public meeting in North Kenai June 20th - location and time to be announced.
Assemblymember Moock congratulated three young athletes from the Borough for their achievement at the State Track Competition.
Assemblymember Brown announced there would be a CIRCAC meeting Saturday in Homer. He will be unable to attend and Mr. Skogstad will replace him.
Assemblymember DeLacee reminded assemblymembers that Ordinance 91-18 is reaching a deadline and will need to be addressed as soon as possible.
INFORMATIONAL MATERIALS AND REPORTS
NOTICE OF NEXT MEETING AND ADJOURNMENT
The meeting of June 4, 1991 was recessed, to be reconvened on June 11, 1991 immediately following the Special Assembly Meeting.
The meeting of June 4, 1991 reconvened on Wednesday, June 12, 1991 at 11:05 P.M. At that time President Skogstad declared the meeting adjourned. All remaining agenda items will be placed on the June 18, 1991 Regular Assembly Agenda under J., Items Not Completed From Prior Agenda.
Date Approved
James W. Skogstad, Assembly President
ATTEST:
Borough Clerk